<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>TV Squad</title>
<link>http://www.tvsquad.com</link>
<description>TV Squad</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>NBC chooses Brett Favre over Tom Brady</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/25/nbc-chooses-bret-favre-over-tom-brady/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/25/nbc-chooses-bret-favre-over-tom-brady/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/25/nbc-chooses-bret-favre-over-tom-brady/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/programming/" rel="tag">Programming</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/oped/" rel="tag">OpEd</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/celebrities/" rel="tag">Celebrities</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/reality-free/" rel="tag">Reality-Free</a></p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="215" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2009/11/01_nbc_nfl_troika_small.jpg" alt="nbc_football_night_in_america" />One of the perks NBC has over the other networks when it comes to its football coverage is what's called the flex schedule. Unlike CBS and Fox and ESPN which get the games that are scheduled months in advance without regard for ideal match ups, NBC has the option of plucking a better game for the <em>Sunday Football Night in America</em> broadcast. Hence the term, flex, as in flexible.<br />
<br />
Thus far this season, NBC has had three chances to flip the switch and passed. However, on December 6, <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/390651-NBC_Flexes_Its_Sunday_Night_Muscle.php">NBC has chosen a Vikings/Cardinals game over a Pats/Dolphins match</a>.<p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/25/nbc-chooses-bret-favre-over-tom-brady/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NBC chooses Brett Favre over Tom Brady</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/25/nbc-chooses-bret-favre-over-tom-brady/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19254848/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/25/nbc-chooses-bret-favre-over-tom-brady/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>40 million</category><category>40Million</category><category>Arizona Cardinals</category><category>ArizonaCardinals</category><category>Bret Favre</category><category>BretFavre</category><category>CBS</category><category>ESPN</category><category>flex schedule</category><category>FlexSchedule</category><category>Football Night in America</category><category>FootballNightInAmerica</category><category>Fox</category><category>Kurt Warner</category><category>KurtWarner</category><category>Miami Dolphins</category><category>MiamiDolphins</category><category>Minnesota Vikings</category><category>MinnesotaVikings</category><category>NBC</category><category>Randy Moss</category><category>RandyMoss</category><category>Ricky Williams</category><category>RickyWilliams</category><category>Super Bowl</category><category>SuperBowl</category><category>Tom Brady</category><category>TomBrady</category><dc:creator>Allison Waldman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>CBS plans Super Bowl halftime and... what comes on after the game</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/13/cbs-plans-super-bowl-halftime-and-what-comes-on-after-the-game/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/13/cbs-plans-super-bowl-halftime-and-what-comes-on-after-the-game/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/13/cbs-plans-super-bowl-halftime-and-what-comes-on-after-the-game/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Other Drama Shows</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/programming/" rel="tag">Programming</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/oped/" rel="tag">OpEd</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/survivor/" rel="tag">Survivor</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/music-and-variety/" rel="tag">Music and Variety</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/celebrities/" rel="tag">Celebrities</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ncis/" rel="tag">NCIS</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/the-mentalist/" rel="tag">The Mentalist</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/the-big-bang-theory/" rel="tag">The Big Bang Theory</a></p><div style="text-align: left;"><em><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="213" border="0" align="right" alt="nfl_logo_cbs" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2009/11/cbs_nfl-232x229.jpg" />"Did you hear who's going to play during the <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/super-bowl/">Super Bowl</a> halftime show?"<br />
"No, who?"<br />
"That's what I just said. Who."<br />
"No, seriously. Which is the band that's going to appear?"<br />
"It's Who."<br />
"I'm not talking proper English. Which band will be on CBS's halftime show on February 7 at Landshark Stadium in Miami?"<br />
"The Who -- you know, Roger Daltrey, Pete Townshend. 'Tommy, can you hear me?'"<br />
"Oh! Why didn't you just say that!"</em></div>
<br />
Okay, I couldn't resist the nod to Abbott and Costello's <em>Who's On First</em>. But the fact is that <em>Sports Illustrated</em> has spread the word that <a href="http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/11/the-who-super-bowl-half-time-show-.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+live_feed+%28The+Hollywood+Reporter+-+The+Live+Feed%29">The Who will star in the Super Bowl big, overblown half-time pageant</a>. This follows the safe pattern the NFL has been employing since the Janet Jackson-Justin Timberlake costume malfunction; that is, stick with classic rock stars who are guaranteed to do their hits and not disrobe. That's why we've had Prince, The Rolling Stones, Paul McCartney and now The Who. All superstar acts, no controversy.<p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/13/cbs-plans-super-bowl-halftime-and-what-comes-on-after-the-game/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CBS plans Super Bowl halftime and... what comes on after the game</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/13/cbs-plans-super-bowl-halftime-and-what-comes-on-after-the-game/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19236249/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/13/cbs-plans-super-bowl-halftime-and-what-comes-on-after-the-game/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Abbott and Costello</category><category>AbbottAndCostello</category><category>CBS</category><category>half time show</category><category>HalfTimeShow</category><category>NCIS Los Angeles</category><category>NcisLosAngeles</category><category>NFL</category><category>post super bowl</category><category>PostSuperBowl</category><category>Super Bowl</category><category>SuperBowl</category><category>Survivor</category><category>The Big Bang Theory</category><category>The Mentalist</category><category>The Who</category><category>TheBigBangTheory</category><category>TheMentalist</category><category>TheWho</category><category>time slot</category><category>TimeSlot</category><dc:creator>Allison Waldman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Americans watching TV at record levels</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/10/americans-watching-tv-at-record-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/10/americans-watching-tv-at-record-levels/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/10/americans-watching-tv-at-record-levels/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/reality-free/" rel="tag">Reality-Free</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2009/11/watching_tv.jpg" />If you're watching television right now, congratulations. You are part of a new world record. <br />
<br />
The Nielsen Company announced that <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20091110/tv_nm/us_viewing">TV viewing for the 2008-09 season reached a new high</a> in average watching time. Now the average American spends four hours and 49 minutes every day in front of the idiot box and the average household spends more than eight hours a day watching television. ("God bless America, land where we loaf, staring down from, our favorite futon, all day and night at the light of HBO")<br />
<br />
However, this doesn't mean everyone to celebrating. In fact, the big four networks (five if you count the CW) actually saw a decline in viewers because we have so many other choices now between cable and the Internet. Do you any of you actually watch that much television?<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/10/americans-watching-tv-at-record-levels/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19231572/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/10/americans-watching-tv-at-record-levels/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Nielsen</category><category>Nielsen Media Research</category><category>nielsen ratings</category><category>NielsenMediaResearch</category><category>NielsenRatings</category><category>Television Ratings</category><category>television watching</category><category>TelevisionRatings</category><category>TelevisionWatching</category><dc:creator>Danny Gallagher</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Was Fox rooting for the Yankees to win the World Series?</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/05/was-fox-rooting-for-the-yankees-to-win-the-world-series/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/05/was-fox-rooting-for-the-yankees-to-win-the-world-series/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/05/was-fox-rooting-for-the-yankees-to-win-the-world-series/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/programming/" rel="tag">Programming</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/oped/" rel="tag">OpEd</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/bones/" rel="tag">Bones</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/reality-free/" rel="tag">Reality-Free</a></p><img width="425" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="299" border="0" align="top" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2009/11/20091104_matsui.jpg" alt="Hideki_matsui_NY_Yankees" /><br />
Considering the incredible <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/11/05/tv-ratings-world-series-game-six-averages-22-3-million-and-a-7-4-adults-18-49-rating/32696">overnight ratings that Fox got for Game Six of the World Series</a>, you might think I'm crazy to suggest that the network would be rooting for the New York Yankees last night to beat the Philadelphia Phillies, but I have evidence. All through the game, Fox was promoting <em>Fringe</em> and <em>Bones</em>, urging viewers to tune in tomorrow night -- tonight -- for new episodes. Why would the network be sending that message when there was a possibility of a Game Seven?<p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/05/was-fox-rooting-for-the-yankees-to-win-the-world-series/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Was Fox rooting for the Yankees to win the World Series?</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/05/was-fox-rooting-for-the-yankees-to-win-the-world-series/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19224961/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/05/was-fox-rooting-for-the-yankees-to-win-the-world-series/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>baseball</category><category>Bones</category><category>commercials</category><category>Fox</category><category>Fringe</category><category>New York Yankees</category><category>NewYorkYankees</category><category>Philadelphia Phillies</category><category>PhiladelphiaPhillies</category><category>promos</category><category>World Series</category><category>WorldSeries</category><dc:creator>Allison Waldman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The 'V' stands for 'very high ratings'</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/04/the-v-stands-for-very-high-ratings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/04/the-v-stands-for-very-high-ratings/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/04/the-v-stands-for-very-high-ratings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/reality-free/" rel="tag">Reality-Free</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/v/" rel="tag">V</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2009/11/v.jpg" />The cast of ABC's new sci-fi drama <em>V</em> have nothing to worry about. That is if you don't count the fact that the show just replaced their <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/04/v-showrunner-has-already-been-replaced/">showrunner</a>, got caught launching a sneaky <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/28/remember-the-v-skywriting-stunt-forget-it/">skywriting campaign</a> and opened with a <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/09/26/abc-is-giving-v-a-split-launch-for-some-reason/">"split launch."</a> <br />
<br />
Last night's episode got off to an <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118010852.html?categoryid=14&amp;cs=1">"out of this world" start </a>scoring a 5.0 rating and a 13 share of 13.9 million viewers. It gave ABC its highest rating among 18-34 year-olds in three years for its timeslot since 2004's <em>Lost</em>. I guess you could say they had a really successful "launch" and the show really "took off." (Insert rimshot here.) <br />
<br />
Of course, this is just the opening episode and could be the result of successful marketing. Do you think <em>V's</em> winning streak will last?<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/04/the-v-stands-for-very-high-ratings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19223395/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/11/04/the-v-stands-for-very-high-ratings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>abc</category><category>Lost</category><category>ratings</category><category>v</category><dc:creator>Danny Gallagher</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>World Series and NBA debut get high ratings</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/29/world-series-and-nba-debut-get-high-ratings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/29/world-series-and-nba-debut-get-high-ratings/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/29/world-series-and-nba-debut-get-high-ratings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/reality-free/" rel="tag">Reality-Free</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2009/10/world_series.jpg" alt="" />Both <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118010549.html?categoryid=14&amp;cs=1">the World Series</a> and <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118010530.html?categoryid=14&amp;cs=1">the start of the NBA season</a> brought in big numbers for their respective networks this week. The MLB faceoff between the Yankees and the Phillies score Fox a 6.3 rating share or 19.3 million viewers in their timeslot. The NBA's doubleheader opener on Tuesday helped TNT score a record-breaking 3.7 million viewers. <br />
<br />
Stories like these make me long for the Yoda-like wisdom of baseball's Yogi Berra. Just think of the grammatically incorrect gems he could conjure. <br />
<br />
"People watch sports because it's easier than playing it." <br />
<br />
"Sports has a big following because so few people follow it."<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/29/world-series-and-nba-debut-get-high-ratings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19215531/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/29/world-series-and-nba-debut-get-high-ratings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>2009 world series</category><category>2009WorldSeries</category><category>Boston Celtics</category><category>BostonCeltics</category><category>Cleveland Cavaliers</category><category>Cleveland Caveliers</category><category>Cleveland Cavs</category><category>ClevelandCavaliers</category><category>ClevelandCaveliers</category><category>ClevelandCavs</category><category>fox</category><category>LA Clippers</category><category>LA Lakers</category><category>LaClippers</category><category>LaLakers</category><category>MLB</category><category>NBA</category><category>NBA on TNT</category><category>NbaOnTnt</category><category>New York Yankees</category><category>NewYorkYankees</category><category>Philadelphia Phillies</category><category>PhiladelphiaPhillies</category><category>ratings</category><category>the world series</category><category>TheWorldSeries</category><category>tnt</category><category>Yogi Berra</category><category>YogiBerra</category><dc:creator>Danny Gallagher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>'Til Death: The new According to Jim?</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/28/til-death-the-new-according-to-jim/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/28/til-death-the-new-according-to-jim/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/28/til-death-the-new-according-to-jim/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Other Comedy Shows</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/oped/" rel="tag">OpEd</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/cancellations/" rel="tag">Cancellations</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/reality-free/" rel="tag">Reality-Free</a></p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="282" border="0" align="right" alt="Brad Garrett and Joely Fisher of 'Til Death" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2009/10/tildeath200-1256763833.jpg" />Every year, there's a show that's on the top of viewers' "You mean that's <em>still</em> on the air?" list. Whether the show was good or not, it was one that hung on in obscurity for years and years, getting just enough of an audience to keep it going. You know the shows I'm talking about: <em>The Facts of Life. Wings. Yes, Dear. Matlock.Just Shoot Me. George Lopez. </em><em>King of the Hill. JAG.</em> Heck, even the great <em>Scrubs </em>was at the top of this list for many people for awhile (still might be for some).<br />
<br />
But for the last five years or so, the reigning champ of that list was <em><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/tag/AccordingtoJim/">According to Jim</a></em>, both because of its inexplicable longevity and its questionable quality. Now, with Jim Belushi's vanity project finally gone, it looks like another show has taken its place: FOX's <em>'Til Death</em>.<br />
<br />
The network just doesn't want to let the show die. Every time the show is in a low-rated slot, the network moves it to one that's higher-profile in an attempt to boost ratings. Case in point: the <a href="http://www.thefutoncritic.com/news.aspx?id=8359">Brad Garrett sitcom will be replacing <em>Brothers</em> on Sundays at 7</a>, starting January 10, after football's regular season is over.<p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/28/til-death-the-new-according-to-jim/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Til Death: The new According to Jim?</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/28/til-death-the-new-according-to-jim/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19213968/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/28/til-death-the-new-according-to-jim/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>according to jim</category><category>AccordingToJim</category><category>brad garrett</category><category>BradGarrett</category><category>brothers</category><category>joely fisher</category><category>JoelyFisher</category><category>obscurity</category><category>til death</category><category>TilDeath</category><dc:creator>Joel Keller</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Comedy Central's Jeff Dunham Show is a smash</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/25/comedy-centrals-jeff-dunham-show-is-a-smash/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/25/comedy-centrals-jeff-dunham-show-is-a-smash/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/25/comedy-centrals-jeff-dunham-show-is-a-smash/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Other Comedy Shows</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/oped/" rel="tag">OpEd</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/video/" rel="tag">Video</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/music-and-variety/" rel="tag">Music and Variety</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/celebrities/" rel="tag">Celebrities</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/reality-free/" rel="tag">Reality-Free</a></p><img width="250" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="311" border="0" align="right" alt="Jeff_dunham_dummies" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2009/10/jeff_dunham_hi_res.jpg" />In the original version of this post, I wrote about the big success of Jeff Dunham on Comedy Central -- last Thursday night, his new show <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118010362.html?categoryid=14&amp;cs=1"><em>The Jeff Dunham Show</em> drew 5.3 million</a> viewers, the highest ever premiere for a show on that network. However, I mistakenly thought the show aired Friday and compared the ratings to shows on other networks that night. I sincerely apologize if that confused readers. Here's the story as it should have been written in the first place.<br />
<br />
Jeff Dunham's success was surprising and quite a feat. As my mother might say, "Go figure." <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/07/23/the-jeff-dunham-show-comes-to-comedy-central-in-october/"><em>The Jeff Dunham Show</em></a>.<br />
<br />
And the number of viewers got even better later that night when a repeat of the show aired -- 7.9 million viewers.<p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/25/comedy-centrals-jeff-dunham-show-is-a-smash/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Comedy Central's Jeff Dunham Show is a smash</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/25/comedy-centrals-jeff-dunham-show-is-a-smash/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19208673/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/25/comedy-centrals-jeff-dunham-show-is-a-smash/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Comedy Central</category><category>ComedyCentral</category><category>demos</category><category>Dollhouse</category><category>dummies</category><category>Jeff Dunham Show</category><category>JeffDunhamShow</category><category>Nielsen</category><category>ratings</category><category>ventriloquist</category><dc:creator>Allison Waldman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 17:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Wil Wheaton means record ratings</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/21/wil-wheaton-means-record-ratings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/21/wil-wheaton-means-record-ratings/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/21/wil-wheaton-means-record-ratings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/oped/" rel="tag">OpEd</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/video/" rel="tag">Video</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/celebrities/" rel="tag">Celebrities</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/reality-free/" rel="tag">Reality-Free</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/the-big-bang-theory/" rel="tag">The Big Bang Theory</a></p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="313" border="0" align="right" alt="Wil Wheaton" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2009/10/picture-4.png" />Remember <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/14/wil-wheatons-episode-of-the-big-bang-theory-looks-amazing/">all</a> <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/09/07/wil-wheaton-to-guest-star-on-the-big-bang-theory/">those</a> posts we did about <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/bloggers/wil-wheaton">former TV Squad writer</a> Wil Wheaton appearing on <em>The Big Bang Theory</em>? Well, the ratings are in and it looks like that episode had a <a href="http://www.tvweek.com/blogs/tvbizwire/2009/10/twitter-campaign-gives-big-ban.php">15% increase in viewership</a> in the sought-after 18-34 demo. While the article attributes the ratings boost to a Twitter campaign by Wheaton and executive producer Bill Prady, we here at TV Squad would like to think that our own promotion of the show contributed in some small way.<br /> <br /> Speaking of which, wasn't the show great? Sure we <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/the-big-bang-theory/">already did a review</a> but it was amazing seeing Wil's screen character win by using the one aspect of playing cards (and, for that matter, reality) that Sheldon can't grasp: the human factor. Sheldon would undoubtedly be great at Blackjack and lousy at Poker.<br /><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/21/wil-wheaton-means-record-ratings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wil Wheaton means record ratings</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/21/wil-wheaton-means-record-ratings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19203356/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/21/wil-wheaton-means-record-ratings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>slashcontrol</category><category>The Big Bang Theory</category><category>TheBigBangTheory</category><category>TV squad</category><category>TvSquad</category><category>Twitter</category><category>Wil Wheaton</category><category>WilWheaton</category><dc:creator>Brad Trechak</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The Cleveland Show gets a full second season</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/15/the-cleveland-show-gets-a-full-second-season/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/15/the-cleveland-show-gets-a-full-second-season/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/15/the-cleveland-show-gets-a-full-second-season/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/animation/" rel="tag">Animation</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/pickups-and-renewals/" rel="tag">Pickups and Renewals</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/reality-free/" rel="tag">Reality-Free</a></p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="177" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2008/11/cleveland_show.jpg" alt="The Cleveland Show" />Not that the future of this series <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/05/04/the-cleveland-show-renewed-before-it-begins/">was ever in doubt</a>, but Fox has extended its original season-and-a-half order of <em>The Cleveland Show</em> <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2009/10/fox-orders-a-full-second-season-of-the-cleveland-show.html">to a full two seasons</a>. Given the strong premiere ratings for the show, seasons beyond number two will likely be in the bag. If Fox didn't extend, they'd have to deal with an irate Seth MacFarlane who currently controls most of their Sunday night line-up.<br />
<br />
Is <em>The Cleveland Show</em> going to end up being more popular than its progenitor <em>Family Guy</em>? Do these ratings simply represent a high initial interest in the new show that will wane over time? I have used the analogy of <em>The Jeffersons</em> spinning off from <em>All In The Family</em>, but did <em>The Jeffersons</em> ever beat <em>All In The Family</em> in the ratings?<br />
<br />
Whatever the case, Seth MacFarlane doesn't have to worry about it for at least two seasons, and probably longer.<br />
<br />
[Watch <a href="http://www.slashcontrol.com/free-tv-shows/the-cleveland-show">clips and free episodes of The Cleveland Show</a> at <a href="http://www.slashcontrol.com">SlashControl</a>]<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/15/the-cleveland-show-gets-a-full-second-season/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19197671/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/15/the-cleveland-show-gets-a-full-second-season/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>American Dad</category><category>AmericanDad</category><category>Family Guy</category><category>FamilyGuy</category><category>Fox</category><category>Seth MacFarlane</category><category>SethMacfarlane</category><category>Sunday</category><category>The Cleveland Show</category><category>TheClevelandShow</category><dc:creator>Brad Trechak</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Laurence Fishburne to do three-part CSI crossover</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/13/laurence-fishburne-to-do-three-part-csi-crossover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/13/laurence-fishburne-to-do-three-part-csi-crossover/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/13/laurence-fishburne-to-do-three-part-csi-crossover/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/programming/" rel="tag">Programming</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/oped/" rel="tag">OpEd</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/csi-crime-scene-investigation/" rel="tag">CSI</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/casting/" rel="tag">Casting</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/reality-free/" rel="tag">Reality-Free</a></p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="165" border="0" align="right" alt="laurence_fishburne_csi" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2009/10/laurence-fishburne.jpg" />Generally speaking, the <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/csi-crime-scene-investigation/"><em>CSI</em></a> franchise has been a ratings juggernaut for CBS. Still, this season the original <em>CSI</em> has been declining a bit. It started last season when <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/03/26/fishburne-is-the-14-million-dollar-man/">Laurence Fishburne</a> took on the role of Dr. Ray Langston, becoming the main man on the show with William Petersen exiting. <br />
<br />
Well, in an effort to perhaps pump up Fishburne's popularity, CBS is doing something unique. For the first time, <a href="http://thefutoncritic.com/news.aspx?id=20091012cbs02">a <em>CSI</em> character -- Langston -- will crossover to the other two shows in the same week</a>, all part of the same story. <br />
<br />
Will it work? Probably. Crossover stunts are always fun and it'll give viewers who watch one of the <em>CSI</em>'s or two, to sample the other. That's not as weird as it sounds. I only watch <em>CSI</em>, not NY or Miami.<p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/13/laurence-fishburne-to-do-three-part-csi-crossover/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Laurence Fishburne to do three-part CSI crossover</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/13/laurence-fishburne-to-do-three-part-csi-crossover/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19194446/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/13/laurence-fishburne-to-do-three-part-csi-crossover/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>crossover</category><category>CSI</category><category>CSI Miami</category><category>CSI New York</category><category>CSI NY</category><category>CsiMiami</category><category>CsiNewYork</category><category>CsiNy</category><category>Dr Ray Langston</category><category>DrRayLangston</category><category>DVR</category><category>Laurence Fishburne</category><category>LaurenceFishburne</category><category>November</category><category>sweeps</category><dc:creator>Allison Waldman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>FOX says they will air all 13 episodes of Dollhouse</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/13/fox-says-they-will-air-all-13-episodes-of-dollhouse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/13/fox-says-they-will-air-all-13-episodes-of-dollhouse/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/13/fox-says-they-will-air-all-13-episodes-of-dollhouse/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/programming/" rel="tag">Programming</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/reality-free/" rel="tag">Reality-Free</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/dollhouse/" rel="tag">Dollhouse</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Dollhouse" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2009/10/dollhous_091013.jpg" />It's not the most encouraging news about the long-term potential of the show, but at least Whedonites can rest assured that <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/12/fox-were-going-to-run-all-the-episodes-of-dollhouse/30262">FOX will honor the entire 13-episode commitment they made to <em>Dollhouse</em></a>. Scheduling guru Preston Beckman said, "During [November] sweeps we might have to jack up the numbers a little [with other programming], but we plan on completing the order for this show."<br />
<br />
Which means if they haven't already decided to yank the show for sweeps period, then they're about to. It doesn't bode well for the series at all, though it's still too early to say if the respectable DVR figures will help things at all. DVR usage is at an all time high, and <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/12/dollhouse-premiere-18-49-rating-increases-to-a-1-5-via-dvr-hopeful-or-futile/30214"><em>Dollhouse</em> leads DVR usage</a>, increasing its demo ratings by a whopping 50% (still only to a 1.5).<br />
<br />
It's a big deal but I still don't think networks know what to do with DVR numbers. Many of those viewers are skipping commercials, so it may not matter in that sense. But it's telling that the Friday shows are the most DVR'd. It's a sign that their fans want to watch these shows, just not on Friday night.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/13/fox-says-they-will-air-all-13-episodes-of-dollhouse/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19193953/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/13/fox-says-they-will-air-all-13-episodes-of-dollhouse/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>13-episode commitment</category><category>13-episodeCommitment</category><category>dollhouse</category><category>dvr</category><category>eliza duskhu</category><category>ElizaDuskhu</category><category>fox</category><category>will air all episodes</category><category>WillAirAllEpisodes</category><dc:creator>Jason Hughes</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>CBS wants more of The Good Wife and NCIS: LA</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/08/cbs-wants-more-of-the-good-wife-and-ncis-la/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/08/cbs-wants-more-of-the-good-wife-and-ncis-la/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/08/cbs-wants-more-of-the-good-wife-and-ncis-la/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Other Drama Shows</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/pickups-and-renewals/" rel="tag">Pickups and Renewals</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ncis/" rel="tag">NCIS</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/reality-free/" rel="tag">Reality-Free</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="The Good Wife" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2009/10/the_good_wife_091008.jpg" />CBS must be pretty happy. They've been dominating the television landscape for the past several years. And their spin-offs policy continues to work very well. In it's premiere week, not only was <em>NCIS: LA</em> the top-rated new show of the season, but it pushed its parent series all the way to number one on the week, achieving its highest ratings, too.<br />
<br />
Those strong ratings have helped boost Julianna Margulies' <em>The Good Wife</em> to the top as well. As a show of thanks and support, <a href="http://www.cbs42.com/entertainment/entertainmenttonight/story/CBS-Green-Lights-NCIS-Los-Angeles-and-The-Good/j33Jy6KdJ0uJrQduyH2QIQ.cspx">CBS has ordered full-season pick-ups for both <em>The Good Wife</em> and <em>NCIS: LA</em></a>. As much as I complain about procedurals dominating the CBS landscape, people want to watch these shows. CBS does them better than anyone.<br />
<br />
So that's one more night locked in and secured for CBS to dominate. If America ever does get tired of procedurals, though, they're in big trouble!<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/08/cbs-wants-more-of-the-good-wife-and-ncis-la/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19189569/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/08/cbs-wants-more-of-the-good-wife-and-ncis-la/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>back nine</category><category>BackNine</category><category>cbs</category><category>full season pick-up</category><category>FullSeasonPick-up</category><category>ncis</category><category>ncis: la</category><category>Ncis:La</category><category>procedural</category><category>the good wife</category><category>TheGoodWife</category><dc:creator>Jason Hughes</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The Next Iron Chef is sizzling</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/08/the-next-iron-chef-is-sizzling/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/08/the-next-iron-chef-is-sizzling/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/08/the-next-iron-chef-is-sizzling/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/reality/" rel="tag">Other Reality Shows</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/food-home-diy/" rel="tag">Food/Home/DIY</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/oped/" rel="tag">OpEd</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a></p><img width="425" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="355" border="0" align="top" alt="the_next_iron_chef_season_two" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2009/10/ironchef.jpg" /><br />
Even though I watch a lot of programming on the Food Network, I have to admit I missed almost all of the <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/05/the-next-iron-chef-season-premiere/"><em>The Next Iron Chef</em></a> in season one. Last Sunday, the second season of <a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/357185-_Next_Iron_Chef_Grills_Food_Network_s_Top_Series_Premiere_Ratings.php"><em>The Next Iron Chef</em> blasted off with the best ratings</a> for a series opener in Food Network history. Over two million viewers, a 1.1 rating among adults 25-54.<br />
<br />
Why the big jump? Well, I think a lot of other people are like me. On Sunday, before I switched over to watch pro football, I clicked on Food Network where they were showing a marathon rerun of the first season of <em>The Next Iron Chef</em>. It only took half an episode for me to kick myself for not having watched the whole first season when it aired. It was terrific.<p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/08/the-next-iron-chef-is-sizzling/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Next Iron Chef is sizzling</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/08/the-next-iron-chef-is-sizzling/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19188937/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/08/the-next-iron-chef-is-sizzling/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Aaron Sanchez</category><category>AaronSanchez</category><category>Alton Brown</category><category>AltonBrown</category><category>challenges</category><category>Food Network</category><category>FoodNetwork</category><category>ratings</category><category>sizzling</category><category>The Next Iron Chef</category><category>TheNextIronChef</category><category>Tom Colicchio</category><category>TomColicchio</category><category>Top Chef</category><category>TopChef</category><dc:creator>Allison Waldman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>NCIS is number one again</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/07/ncis-is-number-one-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/07/ncis-is-number-one-again/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/07/ncis-is-number-one-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/oped/" rel="tag">OpEd</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ncis/" rel="tag">NCIS</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/reality-free/" rel="tag">Reality-Free</a></p><img width="425" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="289" border="0" align="top" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2009/10/ncis.jpg" alt="NCIS_Ziva_Jethro" /><br /> It's bigger than the NFL. It's drawing more than celebrity dancing. It's the little show that could. In its seventh season on the air, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091006/ap_en_tv/us_nielsens;_ylt=Ap4SNt7dH9TPCP80SxSOetauGL8C;_ylu=X3oDMTJpaGR0dGJzBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMDkxMDA2L3VzX25pZWxzZW5zBHBvcwMyMQRzZWMDeW5fcGFnaW5hdGVfc3VtbWFyeV9saXN0BHNsawNpbml0czd0aHNlYXM-"><em>NCIS</em> is the number one show according to the Nielsen ratings</a>. Over 21 million viewers for the week of September 28 put the drama series on the top of the heap, and there's no sign that it was a fluke. This is the <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/09/30/guess-what-the-top-two-shows-were-last-week/">second week in a row <em>NCIS</em> was the top show</a>.<br /> <br /> The question a lot of people are asking, especially those who don't watch or have never even checked out <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ncis/"><em>NCIS</em></a> is this: how did that happen? It's not normal for a show to get stronger after the five year mark. Some, like a <em>Seinfeld</em> for example, start slowly and nearly are canceled, but then find an audience and remain secure for the rest of it's run. Before <em>Seinfeld</em>, <em>The Dick Van Dyke Show</em> had done the same thing.<p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/07/ncis-is-number-one-again/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NCIS is number one again</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/07/ncis-is-number-one-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19187367/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/07/ncis-is-number-one-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>dancing with the stars</category><category>DancingWithTheStars</category><category>football</category><category>most watched</category><category>MostWatched</category><category>NCIS</category><category>NFL</category><category>Nielsen</category><category>number one</category><category>NumberOne</category><category>top 20</category><category>Top20</category><dc:creator>Allison Waldman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The History Channel dilutes its brand with even more reality shows</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/02/the-history-channel-dilutes-its-brand-with-even-more-reality-sho/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/02/the-history-channel-dilutes-its-brand-with-even-more-reality-sho/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/02/the-history-channel-dilutes-its-brand-with-even-more-reality-sho/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/reality/" rel="tag">Other Reality Shows</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/oped/" rel="tag">OpEd</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/pickups-and-renewals/" rel="tag">Pickups and Renewals</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt="Ice Road Truckers" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2009/10/ice_roac_truckers_091001.jpg" />I can't even blame the cable networks for this anymore. The History Channel is expanding its repertoire of reality programs as a direct response to the record ratings they've seen with the ones they have now. What do we expect them to do when we don't show up to watch until they throw <em>Ice Road Truckers</em> and <em>Pawn Stars</em> at us? Apparently, we don't want history on the History Channel.<br />
<br />
They've heard us, which is why <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090930/tv_nm/us_history">The History Channel is bringing us more reality</a>, starting with a spi-off of the aforementioned <em>Truckers</em>. <em>Extreme Trucking</em> will travel the world looking for the most treacherous roadways anywhere, and the brave men and women who drive them.<br />
<br />
We can also look forward to traveling the US with <em>Pickers</em>, as people hunt for rare artifacts. And we'll get down and dirty with a 61-year old feud at a North Carolina NASCAR track with <em>Madhouse</em>. Even more unusual is <em>Sliced</em>, a series where objects are cut in half so we can see what they look like. Hey, if they cut a tree in half we can look at the history of it!<p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/02/the-history-channel-dilutes-its-brand-with-even-more-reality-sho/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The History Channel dilutes its brand with even more reality shows</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/02/the-history-channel-dilutes-its-brand-with-even-more-reality-sho/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19181405/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/02/the-history-channel-dilutes-its-brand-with-even-more-reality-sho/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>america: the story of us</category><category>America:TheStoryOfUs</category><category>extreme trucking</category><category>ExtremeTrucking</category><category>ice road truckers</category><category>IceRoadTruckers</category><category>madhouse</category><category>nascar</category><category>pawn stars</category><category>PawnStars</category><category>pickers</category><category>reality shows</category><category>RealityShows</category><category>sliced</category><category>the history channel</category><category>the people speak</category><category>TheHistoryChannel</category><category>ThePeopleSpeak</category><category>world war ii in hd</category><category>WorldWarIiInHd</category><dc:creator>Jason Hughes</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Dexter, Californication openings rake in the eyeballs</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/01/dexter-californication-openings-rake-in-the-eyeballs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/01/dexter-californication-openings-rake-in-the-eyeballs/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/01/dexter-californication-openings-rake-in-the-eyeballs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Other Comedy Shows</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/dexter/" rel="tag">Dexter</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/reality-free/" rel="tag">Reality-Free</a></p><a href="http://the%20press%20packet%20cover%20for%20showtime%27s%20dexter%20and%20californication/"><img hspace="4" height="186" border="0" align="right" width="250" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2009/09/dexter_californication.jpg" alt="The press packet cover for Showtime's Dexter and Californication" /></a><a href="http://The press packet cover for Showtime's Dexter and Californication">Things are looking good for Showtime's primetime bad boys. </a><br />
<br />
Both <a href="http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/09/showtimes-dexter-californication-hit-series-highs.html"><em>Dexter</em> and <em>Californication</em></a> scored some huge opening numbers last Sunday with Dexter setting a new opening record for the cable network. <br />
<br />
More than 1.5 million sets of eyeballs tuned to the season four opener for <em>Dexter</em> and 821,000 stayed to watch the opener for <em>Californication</em>. That's 3 million single eyeballs for <em>Dexter</em> and more than 1.6 million for <em>Californication</em>.<p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/01/dexter-californication-openings-rake-in-the-eyeballs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dexter, Californication openings rake in the eyeballs</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/01/dexter-californication-openings-rake-in-the-eyeballs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19179898/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/10/01/dexter-californication-openings-rake-in-the-eyeballs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>californication</category><category>dexter</category><category>dexter morgan</category><category>DexterMorgan</category><category>hank moody</category><category>HankMoody</category><category>ratings</category><category>showtime</category><category>showtime original</category><category>showtime original series</category><category>ShowtimeOriginal</category><category>showtimeoriginals</category><category>showtimeoriginalseries</category><dc:creator>Danny Gallagher</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Guess what the top two shows were last week</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/09/30/guess-what-the-top-two-shows-were-last-week/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/09/30/guess-what-the-top-two-shows-were-last-week/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/09/30/guess-what-the-top-two-shows-were-last-week/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/programming/" rel="tag">Programming</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/reality-free/" rel="tag">Reality-Free</a></p><img width="250" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="210" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2009/09/tvnetlogos1.jpg" alt="network logos" />You're probably going to say that <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/dancing-with-the-stars/"><em>Dancing with the Stars</em></a> was one of them, but actually those episodes were numbers 9 and 10. And it wasn't one of the <em>CSI</em> shows or one of the comedies on CBS and it wasn't <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/greys-anatomy/"><em>Grey's Anatomy</em></a>.<br /> <br /> Hint: the two shows are related, and I think they're taking over the television landscape. <a href="http://apnews.excite.com/article/20090929/D9B17R281.html">Here's the full list of the top 20 shows</a> in the Nielsen ratings last week. Three new shows made the list.<p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/09/30/guess-what-the-top-two-shows-were-last-week/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19179437/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/09/30/guess-what-the-top-two-shows-were-last-week/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>fall tv</category><category>FallTv</category><category>ncis</category><category>new shows</category><category>nielsen ratings</category><category>season premieres</category><category>series premieres</category><category>top 20 tv shows</category><dc:creator>Bob Sassone</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>NCIS's big-time return on screen and in the ratings</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/09/23/nciss-big-time-return-on-screen-and-in-the-ratings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/09/23/nciss-big-time-return-on-screen-and-in-the-ratings/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/09/23/nciss-big-time-return-on-screen-and-in-the-ratings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/oped/" rel="tag">OpEd</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ncis/" rel="tag">NCIS</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/reality-free/" rel="tag">Reality-Free</a></p><img width="425" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="335" border="0" align="top" alt="Ziva_Tony_NCIS" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2009/09/ncis-tony-and-ziva-ncis.jpg" /><br />
Over the summer, spoilers were leaked that the <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/08/12/nciss-premiere-will-begin-with-a-bang/"><em>NCIS</em> season premiere would begin with a bang</a>. They weren't kidding. Last night's show was a spine-tingling puzzle of an episode that unraveled scene by scene, building suspense to the ultimate -- satisfying -- conclusion. If you were thinking that, like last year, the team was going to be torn asunder after the way things ended with Ziva being returned to Israel, you were pleasantly surprised. More after the jump. <br />
<br />
However, there's another story to report. The overnight ratings are in and the viewers have spoken. Twenty million of them! <a href="http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/09/good-wife-ncis-los-angeles-premiere-ratings.html">The return of <em>NCIS</em> zoomed to the top of the ratings with 20 million viewers</a> tuning in. That helped CBS launch <em>NCIS: Los Angeles</em>, opening with 18 million, and also bolstered <em>The Good Wife</em> with nearly 14 million. Any way you slice it, those are stellar numbers. The folk at the Black Rock must be dancing in the hallways.<p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/09/23/nciss-big-time-return-on-screen-and-in-the-ratings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NCIS's big-time return on screen and in the ratings</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/09/23/nciss-big-time-return-on-screen-and-in-the-ratings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19171395/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/09/23/nciss-big-time-return-on-screen-and-in-the-ratings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>20 million viewers</category><category>20MillionViewers</category><category>CBS</category><category>Gibbs</category><category>NCIS</category><category>NCIS Los Angeles</category><category>NcisLosAngeles</category><category>Nielsen</category><category>ratings</category><category>The Black Rock</category><category>The Good Wife</category><category>TheBlackRock</category><category>TheGoodWife</category><category>Tony</category><category>Vance</category><category>Ziva</category><dc:creator>Allison Waldman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Now it seems NOBODY cares about Heroes</title><link>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/09/22/now-it-seems-nobody-cares-about-heroes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/09/22/now-it-seems-nobody-cares-about-heroes/</guid><comments>http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/09/22/now-it-seems-nobody-cares-about-heroes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/programming/" rel="tag">Programming</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/heroes/" rel="tag">Heroes</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/ratings/" rel="tag">Ratings</a>, <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/reality-free/" rel="tag">Reality-Free</a></p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="212" border="0" align="right" alt="Greg Grunberg" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tvsquad.com/media/2008/11/heroesgrunberg2.jpg" />The <a href="http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/09/house-rises-heroes-falls-big-bang-tops-half-men-and-more.html">ratings for the first Monday of the fall TV season</a> are in, and it's not looking good at all for <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/heroes/"><em>Heroes</em></a>.<br />
<br />
The NBC show dropped 46% from last season's one hour season opener. Which reminds me, <em>Heroes</em> should never be two hours long. Last night's first hour was boring as hell, and then the second hour was more interesting but still muddy, frustrating, and all over the place.<br />
<br />
In other ratings news, <em><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/house/">House</a> </em>did really well, CBS came in second, and <a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/category/dancing-with-the-stars/"><em>Dancing with the Stars</em></a> didn't do as well as people thought it would (or it usually does).<br /><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;">&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/09/22/now-it-seems-nobody-cares-about-heroes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/forward/19169874/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/09/22/now-it-seems-nobody-cares-about-heroes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>abc</category><category>cbs</category><category>dancing with the stars</category><category>fall tv</category><category>heroes</category><category>house</category><category>monday night ratings</category><category>nbc</category><category>new season</category><category>season premiere</category><category>tv ratings</category><dc:creator>Bob Sassone</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:34:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>